Janet Bidwell

  • 3 Posts
  • 196 Comments
  • 194 Likes
In the continuing saga of the Zillow review which was bounced back to my client for not being "detailed enough", I have spoken to 3 different people at Zillow in the past couple weeks, who each told me someone from Zillow would contact me but didn't. Today after submitting yet another detailed complaint, I received this email: "The review did not contain enough detail to be published. We sent an email to the reviewer asking to provide examples and information to support their rating. They have the ability to login to their profile and add more detail to re-submit the review." As I said in my report, they've already submitted the review TWICE and I'm not going to go back and ask them to re write it again, so I was well aware of WHY it was bounced. The last comment the client had was "screw Zillow".

So one of my listings sold, and in an effort to raise my social media scores, I asked the seller to make a Zillow account and post a review. Which NEVER got posted. So I had to ask him to please write ANOTHER review. Which he did. And this is the response from Zillow: ~`~~ Thank you for your review of Janet R Bidwell on Zillow. Unfortunately, it did not meet our Review Guidelines and was rejected by our moderators. However, with a few edits, Zillow might be able to publish it. Here's some specific feedback from the moderator: Review does not contain a sufficient level of detail to be useful. Please provide specifics about your experience working with the pro. Include specific examples and information that support your ratings. Thanks for contributing and helping others in the Zillow community find great agents. ~~~ It was a 3 sentence review, I read it when he sent it! How ridiculous.

This is some of the most ridiculous advice I've seen in a long time. Rather than pick it apart point by point (the ridiculous notion that agents in the same office COMPARE NOTES). . . your thoughts? http://homebuying.about.com/od/realestateagents/f/070709_Interview-Agents-Same-Company.htm

Wow, pretty sensitive bunch. I noticed the letter and thought this is great, this stuff gets sold on late night webinars as the magic pill for Realtors. To me the negative needs to be posted so it can be discussed, I see agents fall for these things all the time. Does it work, yes! Is it unprofessional, in my opinion yes. I think it's healthy discussion because the bar is so low. The truth is, this business is about relationships so when we post negative or funny stuff I see it as more of emotion of outrage that someone would buy into some cheesy marketing tactic than doing what they should do, their due diligence when selecting an agent. As a side note, most of the tech savvy agents I know are snarky anyway, has anyone actually watched Chris Smith or Chad Hyams stuff? =) Onward and upward!

Having a warm fuzzy attack over here and just have to share: My day started with a phone

Put 5 a day on phone call status... Just give them a call and say "Hey, I was thinking about you, so figured I would call and see how things are going.. blah blah blah.. Hey, since I have you on the phone, can I update my contact info on you? I am on a new kick to stay in better touch with everyone, if ok can I have your address to shoot you out letters, etc? 21 touches a year after that.. hehe

Janet: No, they were legally entitled to the referrals. I simply (honestly) forgot to pay them, because we were doing so many deals it was hard to keep track of it all. They did a year end audit and found my omissions. As it WAS honest on my part, I was shocked to learn of my mistakes. And writing those checks was not fun.

What about calling 'shotgun'? Now, you had to be able to actually see the car before you called it, so most disputes revolved around the actual sighting of the car vs. when 'shotgun' was actually called. Very tough to determine if someone had really seen the car or not. Near impossible to prove. Nonetheless, it was almost always resolved with a round of fisticuffs. If you won - you got shotgun